C1P3
100.00% Utilization16 parts · 1 raw sheets
Area lower bound: 1 sheets · three solves under fixed parameters gave the same sheet count
Optimization parameters: raw sheets 20×20 · kerf 0 mm · edge trimming 0 mm · 90° rotation · solve budget 30 s
Rectangular nesting / Curated layout archives
Review real layouts, full-sheet utilization and the actual sheet count, then start nesting with your own order.
HT21 archive
16 parts · 1 raw sheets
Area lower bound: 1 sheets · three solves under fixed parameters gave the same sheet count
Optimization parameters: raw sheets 20×20 · kerf 0 mm · edge trimming 0 mm · 90° rotation · solve budget 30 s
25 parts · 1 raw sheets
Area lower bound: 1 sheets · three solves under fixed parameters gave the same sheet count
Optimization parameters: raw sheets 40×15 · kerf 0 mm · edge trimming 0 mm · 90° rotation · solve budget 30 s
28 parts · 1 raw sheets
Area lower bound: 1 sheets · three solves under fixed parameters gave the same sheet count
Optimization parameters: raw sheets 60×30 · kerf 0 mm · edge trimming 0 mm · 90° rotation · solve budget 30 s
Rectangular selection
Selected by full-sheet utilization; the images show every raw sheet of the case.
325 parts · 29 raw sheets
Area lower bound: 27 sheets · three solves under fixed parameters gave the same sheet count
Optimization parameters: raw sheets 3660×2440 / 3660×2200 · kerf 1 mm · edge trimming 0 mm · 90° rotation · solve budget 60 s
271 parts · 31 raw sheets
Area lower bound: 29 sheets · three solves under fixed parameters gave the same sheet count
Optimization parameters: raw sheets 3660×2440 / 3660×2200 · kerf 1 mm · edge trimming 0 mm · 90° rotation · solve budget 60 s
263 parts · 22 raw sheets
Area lower bound: 21 sheets · three solves under fixed parameters gave the same sheet count
Optimization parameters: raw sheets 3660×2440 / 3660×2200 · kerf 1 mm · edge trimming 0 mm · 90° rotation · solve budget 60 s
Enter raw sheets, parts and process requirements, then review the per-sheet layout and cutting sequence.